The definition of conservative has changed dramatically over the last two decades. For centuries conservatism simply meant resistance to change — a desire to keep things as they are. This was especially true of those classes whose life was better than others. They wished to keep it that way. Progressives desired change in a way that helped the classes not benefiting from the existing system. There has always been a level of class warfare in every society. There are two kinds of class war — economic and social.

Although it existed, the struggle was relatively benign in the United States for centuries. Starting with the Emancipation Proclamation, the social struggle became more pronounced. It was the Southern Democrat wing of the Democratic Party that struggled to hold on to its privileges as the class who enjoyed a high social class status. With the passage of the Civil Rights Act, the Southern white class lost much of its superior place in Southern society. This strongly exacerbated the struggle with respect to race. Because it was pushed by a Democrat president, LBJ, Southern whites switched to the Republican Party in the 1970s. Over the last half-century that racial social war has not gone away but vastly reduced in its scope.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to The Dakota Scout to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Carla Clarke21 minutes ago

John Cunningham of Sioux Falls has a master’s degree in public administration from Harvard University and 30 years’ experience in local government finance. He has been a consultant in property and tax matters to four foreign countries and was a Democratic candidate for South Dakota State Treasurer in 2022.

That a man with these top notch qualifications could not get elected in South Dakota, because he had a “D” behind his name, is a lot of things, but I will use the word ridiculous to be nice. And I agree, spot on historical analysis.

Avatar

John Fiksdal38 minutes ago

Excellent overview, John! And the ONLY way we’ll ever get anything passed that smacks of equitable economic progress is through citizen initiative!

Vote NO on both amendments I and L.

Avatar

Dean Nasser56 minutes ago(edited)

What a spot on historical analysis. Where in all this does "love your neighbor as you love yourself"?

---"However, the Legislature did not accept this decision by the people. When the administration proposed reductions to federal funding of the program, the Legislature proposed its own constitutional amendment (Amendment I on the ballot) ending funding if federal funding is ever reduced."

--If we do not pass Amendment L, the Constitutional Amendments initiated by 50% + 1 of the people will also remain repealable by a 50% + 1 vote. That makes "the "power of the people to initiate" that many urge as a reason to vote "NO" on L, far less valuable beneath the surface than people think it is.