Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Heart of Everything's avatar

Maggie--let's take a look at the states we outperformed: Alabama, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Wyoming, Arizona, Montana, Arkansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Utah, North Dakota, Ohio, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Hawaii, Iowa, Florida, South Carolina, West Virginia, Texas, Alaska, New Mexico, Oregon. State's outperforming us include: New Jersey, Colorado, New York, Connecticut, Indiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, California, Delaware, Maine. We spend a little over 29% of our state's budget (680 million) on state assistance to schools and local governments. I'm not as familiar as you are with the state's budget, so I don't know what all that funds--it does appear that states who spend less on education generally don't perform as well. That aside, the fact of the matter is that our secondary schools are not college prep schools. Whether they should be or not is debatable, but I assume many SD high school students attend technical colleges that don't require an ACT score for entrance. I know you're a critic of our public schools, and we'd all like our students to perform better, but the Republican solution is often to cut public school funding, shift public dollars to private institutions, home school more students where they are not required to take assessment tests. If the state of our education is truly pathetic, doesn't it have to be partly the responsibility of the state's leadership over the past several decades?

Expand full comment
Les Wolff's avatar

Here again, Graves comparing performance, to set low standards for our students rather than culpability for his performance. Whoever hired him needs to be gone as well.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts