VIEWPOINT: Making Medicaid Expansion a pathway forward
Discover more from The Dakota Scout
VIEWPOINT: Making Medicaid Expansion a pathway forward
Guest column by Rep. Tony Venhuizen and Sen. Casey Crabtree
During the 2023 legislative session, we introduced House Joint Resolution 5004, a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow the state of South Dakota to consider a work requirement for those who enroll in Medicaid expansion. This proposal passed the State House overwhelmingly, but fell a little short in the Senate due to good-faith committee questions about it.
We have accepted input from some of the opponents and believe those concerns have now been addressed, and will be reintroducing this proposal in 2024.
This proposal asks a basic philosophical question: Is Medicaid expansion meant to be a hand up for people facing tough times, or should it be a way of life? We believe that Medicaid, like all social programs, should be a hand up for people who need it. But it should also be a pathway forward to something better.
VIEWPOINT: Blood tests, early detection and the hope for South Dakota
South Dakota voters passed Medicaid expansion in 2022, and the governor and state legislators honored that decision. Medicaid expansion was implemented and went into effect on July 1, 2023, and it is available for eligible recipients today.
One provision of the Medicaid expansion ballot measure, though, causes a problem. The amendment contained language that said that the state cannot impose any requirements on those who receive Medicaid expansion that are not also imposed on other Medicaid recipients.
Why is that a problem?
Because the traditional Medicaid program applies to children, the elderly, the disabled, and in some cases, pregnant women. We don’t apply a work requirement to these recipients, because it wouldn’t make any sense.
Medicaid expansion, though, applies to able-bodied, working-age adults – adults who are aged 18 to 65 and who are not disabled. It makes perfect sense to consider a work requirement for this population.
We want to be clear about what our proposal does, and what it does not do.
Our proposed amendment says that the state may consider a work requirement for these Medicaid expansion recipients, if it is allowed by the federal government.
It does not establish a work requirement for Medicaid expansion. It does not require South Dakota to adopt one in the future. It simply says that we can consider it. And it doesn’t address the program’s specific parameters, such as exemptions for parents of young children or those pursuing further education. Those would be decisions to be made at the time that a requirement is actually considered.
Currently, the Biden administration does not allow states to impose a work requirement in Medicaid expansion. The Trump administration did allow it, and during that time 13 states adopted a work requirement and nine others were working toward it. When President Biden came into office, those requirements were abolished and no new ones are allowed.
We know, though, that President Biden will not be in office forever, and that at some point a future administration will allow a work requirement again. In addition to prior Republican administrations, even the administration of President Bill Clinton was open to work requirements in federal social programs.
When a work requirement is once again allowed, South Dakota should not put ourselves in a position where we cannot even consider it, when every other state has that option. That just doesn’t make sense.
Finally, we want to emphasize that this proposed amendment honors the will of the voters. The voters in 2022 passed Medicaid expansion, and we have implemented it. Our proposal would also go before the voters. We are giving the voters the opportunity to refine their earlier decision with a more specific question. We know they want Medicaid expansion, but would they like to consider a work requirement, or not? If they say “yes,” that will be the will of the voters as well.
South Dakotans are hard-working people, and we believe in the value of work. Medicaid expansion, like all social programs, should be a pathway forward for those who receive it. This proposal is an important step in that direction, and we look forward to the discussion in Pierre in January.
VIEWPOINT: Making Medicaid Expansion a pathway forward
Again, the SD legislators just won’t accept the judgment of its citizens. This is the problem with one party rule of state government, which SD has had for some time. At a certain point arrogance sets in and the party in charge feels they know what’s best regardless of what they’re being told by their constituents.
This is why citizens had to do the work of raising the minimum wage, restricting interest rates on payday loans, approving medical marijuana, voting down abortion bans twice and now Medicaid expansion.
Despite overwhelming approval by SD citizens, Rep. Venhuizen, and Sen Casey feel they need to “protect” South Dakotans from welfare recipients who receive assistance as a “lifestyle”. They need to check the numbers on welfare fraud in SD. It’s minimal to nonexistent. The purpose of Medicaid expansion is to provide health insurance coverage to people working for minimum wage and below a certain percentage of the poverty level. They’ve already admitted that they are exempting the disabled, pre school age children and the elderly who don’t have enough income. Who’s left?
Are there really thousands of South Dakotans wondering around looking for handouts and free health insurance? The uninsured end up in emergency rooms and acute care clinics which eventually raises health insurance rates for the rest of us.
The bill they intend to introduce does nothing to protect South Dakotans from anything. It is simply window dressing to make them look good before their conservative friends in the legislature and once again shows that the one party leadership in South Dakota simply refuses to accept the will of the people.
always a good thing in GOPers minds to impose work requirements...making poor people who need help take a crappy job that won't even cover their gas money or childcare, - let alone rent - puts them further up against the wall -- just what they like to see -- sick.