The Dakota Scout

The Dakota Scout

Share this post

The Dakota Scout
The Dakota Scout
Legislators opt for status quo, won’t require ballot signatures from across South Dakota
State Politics

Legislators opt for status quo, won’t require ballot signatures from across South Dakota

HB 1200 would have forced petition circulators to gather signatures in 35 legislative districts

Joe Sneve's avatar
Joe Sneve
Feb 27, 2023
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

The Dakota Scout
The Dakota Scout
Legislators opt for status quo, won’t require ballot signatures from across South Dakota
2
Share
Sioux Falls Falls voter Perry Steilow was among thousands of voters who opted to vote early ahead of the 2022 General Election. (Joe Sneve/The Dakota Scout)

PIERRE — Petition circulators in South Dakota will be able to continue cultivating signatures from within the state’s urban centers alone.

That’s the takeaway from Monday morning’s defeat of House Bill 1200, which proposed requiring that a portion of signatures needed to put constitutional amendments before voters come from each of South Dakota’s 35 legislative districts. Specifically, the measure would have forced petition circulators to collect at least 1,001 signatures from each legislative district.

Those behind the legislation, including Republican Rep. Liz May, say too often petition circulators gather signatures from within major urban centers like Rapid City and Sioux Falls and do not bother with rural communities. The status quo, they say, does not require any buy-in from sparsely populated areas of the state.

PREVIOUSLY: Future constitutional amendments could require signatures of voters from across the state

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Dakota Scout to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The Dakota Scout
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share